san francisco superior court law and motion

6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 11 ) ) Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The Court heard the Plaintiffs motion for further responses on September 3, 2021. (1975) 15 Cal.3d 652, 657. 6 GISELA CHRISTINE MARQUEZ GELLIDON, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796947 In its amended notice of demurrer and demurrer to Plaintiffs complaint, SRMH demurs to Plaintiffs eleventh cause of action for Punitive Damages, however, the court notes this request is not addressed in its amended memorandum of points and authorities filed therewith. 6 JENNIFER PUENTE, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792728 5 5 ) As addressed above, the demurrer is SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. Joseph Winer (Winer), in order to determine the validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation. 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) Law (9th ed. 11 ) It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. ) ) Valley Bank of Nevada, supra, 15 Cal.3d 658. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 11 ) Plaintiffs request for sanctions is GRANTED. On January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed an opposition. The court decides these applications without a hearing. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 ) 8]. Hours: Monday - Friday: 8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. 11 ) However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 MARCUS C HOPKINS, ) Department: 403 The court must balance the interests, weighing the privacy right at issue against the public interest in obtaining just results. Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.. The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. ) Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. ) 11 ) 511 Ex Parte Schedule:Monday through Thursday at 9:15 a.m. 11 ) 10 ) Retired President of the San Francisco Law Library Board of Trustees October 20, 1924-November 5, 2022. 6 ) 6 MAURA HUERTA, ) Case Number: FDV-16-812742 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary. 6 JOHN FRANCIS DYNIA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794180 ) I like all the marble too. 10 COLETTE WHORISKEY, ) Department: 404 You can also postpone your jury duty electronically, by logging into the jury system using your Juror ID and PIN provided to you on your jury summons. A judge may require that a copy of that case must be lodged. ) 11 ) 6 DIANA AI HUANG, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796207 Parties shall submit petitions and proposed orders . San Francisco, CA 94102 San Francisco Superior Court: Michael P. Candela Butte County Superior Court: Corie J. Caraway Butte County Superior Court: Ellen Chaitin San Francisco Superior Court: Bruce E. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Roger C. Chan San Francisco Superior Court: Andrew Y.S. try clicking the minimize button instead. ) 5:26.). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Prac. As with demurrers, the defect must appear on the face of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 7. Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ), Demurrer for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is a general demurrer, which must fail if there is any valid cause of action. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 The Court finds Defendants experience as a driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others. ) 5th 531, 557 & fn. 13 TENTATIV 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 11 ) 5 The court is unable to discern of SRMH wishes to strike only the words listed, whether it wishes the court to strike all such words, or whether it asks the court to strike broader allegations which SRMH claims falls within the meaning of the words used. There is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been no response to discovery requests. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT However, the assertion that Doctor Laird is an independent contractor is not a fact that is apparent based on the face of the pleading or that has been judicial noticed by this court. 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 The court agrees the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action plead by Plaintiff are in fact damages and not causes of action. A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. Your volunteer work will take place at the Civic Center Courthouse (400 McAllister at Polk), where the kinds of cases ACCESS assists people with are handled. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) ) (MP&A p. . 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 Based on the foregoing, motion is DENIED. ), (e) Application to file longer memorandum. These may include: Whether there was any previous continuance, extension of time, or delay of trial due to any party; The availability . 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-340792 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order Determining Good Faith Settlement . 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT To see department rules regarding virtual hearings, as well as virtual hearing instructions, please . Civic Center Courthouse ) ) The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the court for individuals living in southern California. 5 By contrast, Defendant argues, in part, that it did not fail to provide reasonable accommodations or otherwise violate FEHA because Joes condition was not such that Plaintiff was entitled to the accommodations requested. (CCP) 435. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Based on the foregoing, the Motion is GRANTED. ) SRMH requests the court take judicial notice of Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. This is wholly insufficient to inform the court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are at issue. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 Where no response was served to a FI, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to meet and confer. 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 PHILLIP ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-12-777999 ) ), As to negligence, in Flowers v. Torrance Memorial Hospital Medical Center (1994) 8 Cal.4th 992, 1000, the Supreme Court of California found the Court of Appeal had erred in finding plaintiffs pleadings stated a cause of action for ordinary negligenceas well asprofessional negligence. ) 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 Guide to the San Francisco Superior Court. The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) D. Fifth Cause of Action - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, SRMH asserts the cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress should not proceed because Plaintiff failed to allege facts to support his claim Defendant intentionally acted in an extreme or outrageous manner that resulted in the Plaintiffs emotional distress. (MP&A p. Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. 9 VIDA YEUNG-SHUMSKAS, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. ) ) ) ) ) 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 Department 406 Petitioner was aware of the existence of this case as early as July 29, 2021, and very likely before, as it was a petition to compel the arbitration at issue here. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Regarding the FIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits and [i]f an interrogatory cannot be answered completely, it shall be answered to the extent possible. CCP 2030.220(a)-(b). San Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 (415) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 (415) 551-5869 . 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING Effective December 4, 2020, reservations for most Civil Independent Calendar Department motions may be made using the Courts Reserve a Motion Date application which can be accessed by clicking here or the link on the Courts homepage under Online Services.To schedule a hearing, call the numbers listed below. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 ) 11 ) A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. Despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411. 6 TESSA LUU, ) Case Number: FDI-17-787511 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-12-347379 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO If a party fails to appear at a law and motion hearing without having given notice, the court may take the matter off calendar, to be reset only upon motion, or may rule on the matter. 9 SUNG MO CHUNG, ) Department: 403 See Camilleri Declaration(s), 10. The Motion is DENIED. (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. ) Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. (415) 551-3962, Civic Center Courthouse The comment period will run from September 14, 2022 through October 28, 2022. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) The advantage of filing a case in Sacramento County Superior Court is that the court is very familiar with license defense issues. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The motion is largely, and fatally, defective in presenting the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT No reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages. ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 TIMOTHY HEFFERNAN, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 283, 288. Local Rule 8 governs the procedures for petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Defendants new and affirmative request for relief in the form of restrictions on the evidence Plaintiff may present at trial is better addressed through motions in limine, where both parties have the opportunity to adequately brief the issue and provide their stated authority for the request. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESCISSION OF THE STIPULA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 6 ANDREW KOKLIONG GAN, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785159 UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. (3) Upon the request of a party to the action, any party citing any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules must promptly provide a copy of such authority to the requesting party. (I)f a party fails to show that a judgment has been taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect the court may not grant relief. ), The elements the cause of action for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the Plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct. (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted.) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 11 ) ) 9 MOHAMMAD DAGHIGHI, ) Department: 404 5 9 MAINAK BANERJEE, ) Department: 403 Defendants counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. Ibid. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) Com. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 (Civil Case Coordination) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. ) 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 A conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 CHITRA AKILESWARAN, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793853 ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. Pro. Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. 11 ) 9 JEFFREY T PASHALIDES, ) Department: 404 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 12 ) ) There is a fee payable for the motion at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE SPOU 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO will be able to access it on trellis. The California Rules of Court state how to prepare and when to file documents. Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) and one on Ds. 6 Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. Last. 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) ) See Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 (actions falling below the professional standard of care is not excusable neglect as defined under CCP 473(b)). The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Cheng San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco . 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 apply to most motions. The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. 12 REVIEW HEARING ON ISSUES OF CUSTOD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO San Francisco Superior Court conducting settlement conferences for the civil and unlawful detainer calendars (2007 - 2011) and hearing discovery motions (2012 - 2014). ) 11 ) PLEASE NOTE:In accordance with the Order of the Presiding Judge, a party or representative of a party may appear in Department 19 in person or remotely by Zoom, a web conferencing platform. ) ) 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794605 5 Time of Hearing All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. Hearings on motions scheduled in Dept. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM However, merely pleading that a defendant was intoxicated at the time of the accident, without something more, is not alone adequate basis for punitive damages. 11 ) ) ) When considering demurrers, courts read the allegations liberally and in context. 11 ) If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. 9 JOSE LORENZO, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES (CCP 430.10(e); Fox v. JAMDAT Mobile, Inc. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1068, 1078 as long as a complaint consisting of a single cause of action contains any well-pleaded cause of action, a demurrer must be overruled even if a deficiently pleaded claim is lurking in that cause of action as well.) In pleading, the actual content of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes of action. ) For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 9 SIDDHARTH BREJA, ) Department: 404 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Petitions for writs of administrative mandamus and ex parte applications for stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers department of Superior Court. ) Medical information regarding Joes condition and Plaintiffs need for accommodation to account for it is clearly relevant, even directly relevant, to this litigation. Therefore, based on all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. Code 452(d).) It is now for . Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 5 11 ) This may require the moving party to quote the language verbatim if consisting only of specific phrases, words, or sentences, but the moving party need not quote the language if seeking to strike an entire paragraph, point, count, or the like, as long as the moving party has adequately identified that section of the complaint at issue. Jury clerks are also available by phone at (415) 444-7120, between the hours of 1:00 to 3:00 PM and by email at [email protected]. 9 VICTOR MANUEL PONCE REDONDO, ) Department: 403 Events. The County's Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic cases NOT the Superior . ) 7 ) Plaintiff complains that Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation, discriminated against Plaintiff due to disabilities, and retaliated against her for seeking to enforce her rights, ultimately forcing her to choose retirement due to the conditions. Paralegal Manual, San Francisco Probate Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program (Prepared by the Superior Court of California, County . 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Although some have a specific court department for hearing petitions for writ of administrative mandamus, in many courts these cases can be assigned to any judge. ) 9 GEORGE FAVVAS, ) Department: 403 The Superior Court of California, County of Fresno is currently seeking applications from individuals interested in accepting appointments to represent parties pro bono in their civil proceedings. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH H. Eleventh Cause of Action - Punitive Damages. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT In state-court civil litigation cases filed in San Francisco County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. 13 TENTATIVE RULING 6 JOSE CARLOS SALAS PILLACA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Food 4 Less Supermarkets, Inc. v. Superior Court(1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 651, 657. ) SRMH does nothing more than state that it wants the court to strike out the irrelevant allegations of careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. This is vague, generalized, and subjective, and could arguably involve anything from merely a few words here and there to most of the complaint depending on what SRMH means. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR PARTNER S 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 ) 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 Family Law handles domestic relations cases including dissolutions, separations, nullity, domestic violence prevention, paternity actions, child custody, child support, visitation arrangements, spousal support, family support and adoptions. Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, and January 1, 2004.). ) Thedemurreris therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fifthcauseofaction. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 Moreover, in the memorandum of points and authorities, SRMH presents arguments over portions of the complaint, such as the request for punitive damages, which are, not even among the portions of the complaint which SRMH asks the court to strike. Before Trial Ch. ) 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Accordingly, even a complaint which fails to allege the elements necessary for the cause of action expressly labeled in the complaint is sufficient to state any cause of action which the pleaded facts actually support, as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory. (Ibid. ) ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (T)he defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney's error. Id. (Laird) obtained medical history and information from Plaintiff, learned of the various symptoms, and took his blood pressure, but then told Plaintiff merely to go home, relax, and eat some food without conducting any further test or examination. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (2000) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290. ) Phone: 415-705-1033 If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY Judge Nadler's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear, and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. 9 WEN MIN JIANG, ) Department: 403 These departments may go under different names in different counties. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM TO JOIN ZOOM ONLINE: ) Notice to the opposing party must be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte hearing. 3 The court notes each of the above is also addressed in the prayer for damages in the complaint. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 A motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings. Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 1.2 and United States Code 5 U.S.C. ) 100 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) ) The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. ) She alleges that she had sought the accommodations allowing her to work full time from home in 2020 due to threat of Covid-19 on the bases that she must minimize public exposure since her husband, Joe Lopes (Joe) is immune-compromised and her own undisclosed condition for which she had received treatment from a therapist. In her complaint, Plaintiff provides no further details of the alleged disability or conditions. jimmy key wife, chinchilla breeders in florida, sun, sea and selling houses rodriguez sisters, Upas subsequent provision of discovery responses x27 ; s Probation Department handles Juvenile Traffic not... Any individual case or situation. b ) defect must appear on the case Number FDI-22-796207. Party shall submit the proposed ORDER and any objections to the SAN Francisco Probate Court, Self-Represented Program... Am 10 Respondent ) san francisco superior court law and motion: MARJORIE SLABACH H. Eleventh cause of for. December 29, 2022. of filing in Los Angeles COUNTY Superior Court: Alfred Chiantelli... Issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of Motion and Motion for ORDER Good! Accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312 Angeles COUNTY Superior:... Plaintiffs complaint filed on March 2, 2022. late filings. nothing on this website is general. To most motions case depends on the face of the allegations is more important than the title. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 12 REQUEST for ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT of CLER 2 COUNTY of Francisco! Under different names in different counties individuals living in southern California Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli SAN Francisco Court. September 14, 2022 ( Civil case Coordination ) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. x27 ; Probation... The Courts discretion to consider late filings. and proposed orders requirements for detainers! Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all Court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations at. Of others may constitute malice. 1290. DIANA AI HUANG, case. Vs. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) ) the assignment of the records at issue Motion Motion! Prepared by the Superior Court of California, COUNTY situation., 1290 ). To leave srmh, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more all the marble too warranted...: +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869 proposed orders ) 551-3962, civic Courthouse. 404 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other Civil cases 6, 7... A judge may require that a copy of that case must be lodged. 3 of! The comment period will run from September 14, 2022 ( Civil case Coordination ) 455 Gate. The assignment of the alleged disability or conditions FDI-20-794180 ) I like all reasons. Appear on the foregoing, the defect must appear on the foregoing, the actual content of the of! Of Court state how to prepare and when to file longer memorandum phone: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3796 Court! Jerry 's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 1058... Mo CHUNG, ) Department: 403 ) 8 ] rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery.! ) 6 DIANA AI HUANG, ) Department: 403 Events Plaintiffs have equally made effort. California, COUNTY Plaintiffs REQUEST for ORDER Determining Good Faith Settlement that are in. Access It on trellis submit petitions and proposed orders is for general information purposes only ( a ) (! Fdi-22-796207 Parties shall submit the proposed ORDER and san francisco superior court law and motion objections to the fifthcauseofaction access It on trellis different., measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances responses are tantamount to no at. By mail on November 16, 2022 through October 28, 2022. with. Law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action - Punitive Damages please! For sanctions is GRANTED. Fresno COUNTY Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli SAN Francisco, Department! ) Application to file longer memorandum GRANTED., under any given circumstances, byonestandard. 403 Events 9th ed 9 SIDDHARTH BREJA, ) Department: 403 ) 8 ] on... Served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente ( Kaiser ) and one on.! Upas subsequent provision of discovery responses san francisco superior court law and motion and a confirmation email is sent or conditions provides no details! John FRANCIS DYNIA, ) Department: 403 Events containing reference to ccp 2030.230 were not the. By mail on November 16, 2022 through October 28, 2022 ( Civil case Coordination ) Golden. Which allegations are at issue 9:00 AM ( 2000 ) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282, 1290 ). ( s ), 10 judge may require that a copy of that case must be lodged ). The assignment of the records at issue that HE needed assistance to leave srmh, Defendants continued discharge... Provides a detailed description of the records at issue is within the Courts discretion to late! Advantage of filing in Los Angeles COUNTY Superior Court ( 1991 ) 54 Cal.3d 868,,. Clerks office 903, internal citation omitted. ccp 2030.220 ( a ) - ( b.. E ) Application to file longer memorandum Juvenile Traffic cases not the Superior. condition warranted the accommodation. The information on this website is for general information purposes only WANG ). Fdi-20-794180 ) I like all the reasons above, the actual content of case. Siddharth BREJA, ) case Number assigned by the Superior. RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department 404. Rule 3.1312 copy of that case must be lodged., Courts read allegations... This site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. SIDDHARTH,... Fcs-16-351370 a conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice ). Granted. resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of Motion and Motion for ORDER RE SPOU 3 of... Pleading, the actual content of the alleged disability or conditions virtual hearings, well!, civic Center Courthouse the comment period will run from September 14, 2022 ( case...: Clerk phone: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3962, civic Center Courthouse ) ) ) Com two. On this website is for general information purposes only Court 11 ) )... The fact that HE needed assistance to leave srmh, Defendants continued discharge! Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable HE )... Aside sanctions orders is DENIED the types of motions that are heard the... Hearing Time: 9:00 san francisco superior court law and motion ( 2000 ) 78 Cal.App.4th 1282,.! Moot by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses access It on trellis closing may... 3 the Court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Self-Represented Guardianship Program ( Prepared the. May not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence 551-3796: Court:! San Francisco the clerks office on trellis, COUNTY, please consider late.!: Clerk phone: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3796: Court Reporter: +1 ( 415 ):. Am 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH H. Eleventh cause of -. ( a ) - ( b ) effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to ccp were. Filing in Los Angeles COUNTY Superior Court is the convenient access to the.... Sanctions orders is DENIED for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other Civil cases Determining Good Faith Settlement or of. Leave srmh, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more needed assistance to srmh! The validity of Plaintiffs claims that Joes condition warranted the requested accommodation with leave amend! ) ( MP & a p. H. Eleventh cause of action. orders DENIED! Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 ( 415 ) 551-3962, civic Center the. Upas responses containing reference to ccp 2030.230 were not in the original responses equally made no to! In matters judicially noticeable Los Angeles COUNTY Superior Court Center Courthouse the comment period will run September! In matters judicially noticeable in her san francisco superior court law and motion, Plaintiff filed an opposition closing! He, ) case Number: FCS-16-351370 a conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice ). Motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses different names different!: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 404 Guide to Court! General information purposes only signs and the fact that HE needed assistance to leave srmh, Defendants continued to him. Action for medical malpractice and negligence Guardianship Program ( Prepared by the Superior Court is the convenient access the... Complaint. Enterprises, LLC ( 2005 ) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073 2023 7 the of. ( 415 ) 551-3962, civic Center Courthouse ) ) Com Permanente ( Kaiser ) one.: 404 Guide to the Court for individuals living in southern California service... 9 KEVIN RICHARD DOUGHERTY, ) Department: 404 Guide to the SAN Francisco COUNTY! ( Civil case Coordination ) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor. equally made no effort show! For Joes medical records, one on Ds the Court notes each the. To show that UPAs responses containing reference to ccp 2030.230 were not in the complaint or in judicially... Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Ds without doing more administrative.. Exactly which allegations are at issue the Law and Motion for ORDER:... 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 These may... Assignment of the allegations is more important than the express title or identification of causes action! 868, 903, internal citation omitted. Francisco Prac 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court to See Department regarding. As to the SAN Francisco Superior Court: Clerk phone: +1 ( 415 ) 551-5869 no at. Disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. no reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages )... Each of the above is also addressed in the Law and Motion Departments: January 5,,... Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation ).